Leonardo's so-called "Cartoon" ... hesitating on the borderline between Enigma and Allegory

 

Leonardo’s so-called cartoon … why did he keep it beside him ?  Why was it unfinished ? 

These questions continue to annoy me. 

First guess … he might have abandoned it to finish other paintings.

Second guess … he wasn’t sure HOW to finish it … he might have been undecided about the background … he was certainly undecided about the foreground.  He might have been “paralyzed” by a difficult choice.

Third guess … he hesitated to include imagery that might have been unacceptable to the church if it conflicted with their dogmatic adherence to the standard biblical narrative.  He might have wanted to depart from the Church’s conventional iconography in some small way.  In those days patrons and purchasers were inclined to specify and even dictate the details to be shown by the artist.  Strict contracts were often agreed by artist and patron.

The notes in Wikipedia are very helpful, but not fruitfully speculative.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Virgin_and_Child_with_Saint_Anne_and_Saint_John_the_Baptist

The Cartoon’s vaguely sketched foreground intrigues me.  At first I never noticed it.  I think Leonardo hesitated because he had two or three choices. 

First Choice … It is possible a client wanted the Queen of Heaven to be royally shod as befitting her status.  In both versions of THE VIRGIN OF THE ROCKS Leonardo didn’t show her feet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_of_the_Rocks

 

Second Choice … if her feet were to rest on solid ground, then there would be the question of appropriate flowers and plants, or floor boards or flagstones, etc.

Third Choice … I like to think that the unshod foot and the vaguely drawn stones or pebbles in the foreground of The Cartoon were intended to be partly submerged in a crystal-clear stream … some kind of metaphor for the “River of Life”. 

For instance, water might offer a hint that one must dip one’s toe in the stream of life in order to reach one’s supposed destiny.  It might be that a stream would represent a moment of choice when one must either cross or turn aside.  Or ... it might only be that the Lady was just enjoying the sensual coolness of the water after a long walk.  I’m not sure such a simple human pleasure would have been on any client’s agenda back in those difficult times.

There is no reasonably strong justification for my suggestion, but this is the helpful advice I would have given Leonardo if he was well-and-truly, nail-bitingly stuck ... and if he’d asked me nicely, man-to-man.

yet another visit to the leonardo cartoon prompts a minor brainstorm ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Virgin_and_Child_with_St_Anne_and_St_John_the_Baptist

i've probably sat in front of this drawing forty times in forty years but usually with less than full concentration

today i consciously searched the picture for fresh details and allowed my attention to spend some time in the lower "incomplete" part of the drawing

leonardo has been quoted as saying  something like "art is never finished, only abandoned"

ho hum !  i'm not sure if the suggestion i'm about to make can be taken seriously ... i have no scholarly axe to grind because i am not a scholar, i don't have the mental strength to do serious research and juggle other people's ideas ... but i want to ask, are the ladies' feet cooling in a stream of water ?

someone may have suggested this before but how would i know ? ... and if they are cooling their toes, then how would roman catholics have interpreted the image six hundred ( correction: WHOOPS ! ONLY FIVE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN ... ) years ago ?  your scholarly answers on a postcard, toot sweet, please ?