https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Gossaert
... to be continued ... as and when ...
... of the seven deadly sins, the eighth and most horrid is emotional blackmail ... whilst for this blogger, the only sacred thing is life itself
Yes. Omphale shifts quite a bit depending on who is telling the story, when it’s being retold, and what the author wants the myth to emphasize.
At the core of the myth, she is the queen of Lydia who temporarily owns or commands Heracles after he is sold into servitude. The famous image is the reversal of gender roles: Heracles wears women’s clothing and spins wool, while Omphale may wear his lion skin or carry his club. But the meaning of that setup changes dramatically across retellings.
In older Greek sources, Omphale is often portrayed as:
The tone is not always mocking. Some versions treat the relationship as transformative for Heracles: his servitude becomes part of his purification after killing Iphitus. Omphale’s authority is real, not just comic.
Ancient authors sometimes frame her as clever, cultured, and civilized in contrast to Heracles’ violence.
Later writers, especially Roman ones such as Ovid, often lean harder into:
The image of Heracles cross-dressing becomes a spectacle. Omphale can appear flirtatious, teasing, or manipulative rather than simply regal. The myth becomes a way to explore anxieties about masculinity, desire, and power.
Roman art especially loved the visual contrast:
Omphale’s character changes again because later European writers often moralized classical myths.
She could become:
In some Renaissance paintings and literature, she is portrayed almost as a dominatrix figure controlling Hercules. The emphasis shifts away from her political status and toward the danger of feminine power.
Contemporary retellings tend to reinterpret Omphale more sympathetically or psychologically.
Modern classicists, novelists, and feminist readings often see her as:
Some modern works treat the period with Omphale as one of the few times Heracles learns restraint, domesticity, or emotional vulnerability rather than constant conquest.
There’s also more interest now in how the myth destabilizes binary ideas of masculinity and femininity instead of simply mocking role reversal.
Across most versions, a few elements remain stable:
But how that transformation is interpreted changes a lot:
So Omphale herself evolves from sovereign queen, to seductive controller, to moral warning, to potentially subversive or empowering figure depending on the cultural moment retelling the myth.
![]() |
in 1672, when the head was already two thousand years old, one of the grandest of the medicis had the horse's topknot made into a water spout ... and so the whole thing then got covered in an accumulation of limescale, inside and out ... and then later on, somebody hacked off the limescale with a chisel, you can see the marks all over, especially around the horse's nostrils ... etc etc
https://www.getty.edu/publications/artistryinbronze/conservation-and-analysis/39-salvioli/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDV3SpsW08Q&t=1854s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Birth_of_the_Milky_Way
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Paul_Rubens
https://www.theoi.com/greek-mythology/star-myths.html
it needs to be said at the start ... this was painted when rubens had already been dead for nearly twenty years ... so i'm guessing its an inspired work of "fandom" ... it was painted in Italy when luca giordano was only 25 or 26 years old
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luca_Giordano
i'm not sure which of rubens' paintings Giordano could have studied in Italy, but i think he captures much of rubens' flamboyance and energy
rubens ... painted around 1630
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minerva_Protecting_Peace_from_Mars
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Paul_Rubens
rubens ... painted around 1639
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequences_of_War
https://eclecticlight.co/2021/01/04/god-of-the-week-janus/
etching published as part of the capricci series in 1785
the artist had already died back in 1770
his son, giovanni domenico tiepolo, had possesion of his works
https://www.rct.uk/collection/807843/vari-capricci
but i didn't know that the V&A have an album of his rough sketches ...
so we can see how this great composition was condensed out of the internal "cloud" of his imagination
https://www.hellenicaworld.com/Art/Paintings/en/Part24887.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaune_Altarpiece
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igTCJ7TCrOo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Judgment_%28Michelangelo%29
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q724UHh51YU
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Vision_of_the_Last_Judgement
https://www.blakearchive.org/search/?search=vision%20of%20the%20last%20judgement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yF09Wn34Nc0&t=485s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3s3X7xvn_8&t=129s
... to be continued intermittently ...
... this portrait was commissioned shortly after the subject's death during childbirth ...
the museum notes are copied below ... now read on ...
This superb panel is a fine example of fifteenth-century Florentine portraiture. Artists of the time followed classical dictates: body proportions were idealised while faces left devoid of expression were expected to convey character. In this half-length portrait, the sitter appears in strict profile, with her arms bent and her hands clasped together. In the background, a selection of personal belongings appears within a simple architectural frame. The cartellino to the right bears part of an epigram by Martial and the date of his death in Roman numerals. The model has been identified as Giovanna Tornabuoni on the basis of a medallion by Niccolò Fiorentino showing her likeness and her name. She is also portrayed full length in the Visitation fresco painted by Ghirlandaio for the Tornabuoni chapel in the church of Santa Maria Novella (Florence).
Ghirlandaio began his career as a goldsmith. According to Vasari: “from the habit of constantly drawing, [he] acquired great agility, skill and deftness, so that many say that while he was slow as a goldsmith, when he painted the country people or anyone who passed through his studio he immediately captured their likeness”. Vasari also noted that, “this is demonstrated by innumerable portraits by his hand in which one sees a remarkable lifelikeness”. We find further references by Vasari in his text to Ghirlandaio’s skill in this pictorial genre.
Giovanna Tornabuoni is one of the most appealing and fascinating portraits in the Thyssen-Bornemisza collection. This beautiful image is set against a background with a niche containing various objects referring to the sitter’s refined tastes and character. The jewel with the dragon, two pearls and a ruby, which forms a set with the pendent hanging from a silk cord around her neck, refers to her public life. This dragon brooch is balanced on the other side by the prayer book and string of coral beads that has been identified as a rosary, both of which emphasise her piety and her inner life. In between them is a cartellino with part of an epigram by Martial (XXXII) entitled To a Portrait of Antonius Primus and the date underneath. It reads: “Art, if only you could reproduce the character and the spirit. There would be no finer portrait in the world”.
This image is a classic example of the Florentine Quattrocento portrait in which the sitter poses upright, in strict profile and bustlength with the arms in repose and the hands joined. In the face and body the features and proportions are idealised. In the present example, this is evident both in the lines that create the slender neck and shape of the body and in the expressionless and perfect features. As in other portraits of this period, the ideal beauty used to depict Giovanna Tornabuoni is based on theoretical principles and examples taken from classical antiquity, which artists of this date then combined with the individual features of the particular sitter.
The sitter’s identity was established through medals of her, such as the one attributed to the engraver Niccoló Fiorentino in the National Gallery of Art, Washington, in which Giovanna is depicted in profile with a jewel around her neck and an inscription with her name. The medal was possibly commissioned in connection with her marriage. Ghirlandaio also depicted her in one of the frescoes in the series executed in the chancel of Santa Maria Novella, commissioned by Giovanna’s father-in-law and painted by Ghirlandaio between 1486 and 1490. In these frescoes Giovanna occupies an important position in the episode of The Visitation. Placed to the right of the composition, she is at the head of a line of three figures. Although depicted full-length, her pose, dress and accessories are the same as in the present panel.
Giovanna degli Albizzi, born on 18 December 1468, married Lorenzo Tornabuoni on 15 June 1486. She died two years later, on 7 October 1488, during childbirth. For Jan Lauts the present portrait is prior to the fresco in Santa Maria Novella and may have been the modello for that work. John Pope-Hennessy, however, considered it to be later than the fresco and to be a posthumous portrait in which the date on the cartellino is that of Giovanna’s death. The painting, which was among the possessions of the Tornabuoni family in their palace in Florence, came into the ownership of the Pandolfini family in the 17th century. Later it was in the collection of baron Achille Seillière and the princess Sagan. In 1878 it is recorded in Brighton in the collection of Henry Willet, from where it passed to that of Rodolphe Kann. Acquired by J. Pierpoint Morgan in 1907 it entered the Thyssen-Bornemisza collection from the Morgan Library, New York, in 1935.While it was in the Pierpont Morgan Library an old photograph of the West Room taken prior to 1913 shows the panel in its present frame, displayed on an easel on one side of the room surrounded by other works from the collection.
Mar Borobia
you can examine the gigapixel image in microscopic detail here ...