Saturday, March 9, 2024

time before time ... from the British Museum ...















If you already had ...

An oval astronomical compendium. 

It comprises a wind-rose, a table of latitudes, an equinoctial sundial, a compartment to hold a compass (now missing), a shallow compartment the purpose of which is unknown, and a nocturnal. 

The wind-rose is marked with the names of 32 directions in a pattern used on other instruments of the same period. 

The latitude-table lists 25 major European cities in England and on the continent with latitude values as known from contemporary sources. 

The equinoctial sundial consists of an hour-ring engraved on both sides for the two halves of the year, and a gnomon, set by a quadrant with a latitude scale.

 The hour ring is engraved with the name of the maker as 'R Grinkin Fecit'. 

The nocturnal is constructed in a way first used by Humfrey Cole in 1590.



... and if you had subsequently acquired ...







 










GOLD PAIR-CASED VERGE CLOCK-WATCH
LONDON, 1693

SIGNED: 'D. Quare London 0233'

The celebrated London watchmaker Daniel Quare was a Quaker, born in Somerset, who became a Brother in the Clockmakers' Company in London in 1671, later serving as Master of the
 Company in 1708. 

Around 1715 he went into partnership with one of his former apprentices Stephen Horseman, and, following Quare's death in 1724, Horseman carried on the business until he was declared bankrupt in 1733. 

Quare's reputation was built on fine clocks and watches as well as a series of high-quality barometers, of which several survive. 

This does not mean that Quare made all the pieces himself. Like so many makers of the time he doubtless relied on other craftsmen to supply his materials. It is known, for instance, that he used the expertise of Joseph Williamson to produce a number of sophisticated longcase clocks with equation of time indication. 

Quare was not only involved in horological pursuits; as well as owning land, he had a half share in the trade of the East Country Company with a fellow watchmaker, Francis Stamper, and also had land interests with the Quaker community in America.


This typical example of Quare watchwork shows why London was beginning to lead the world in watchmaking towards the end of the seventeenth century.

 Clock-watches, which automatically strike the hour like a clock, had existed since the early years of the watch in the first quarter of the sixteenth century. However, in London, following the introduction of the balance spring, their popularity seems to have been in decline. 

The quality of this watch is self-evident, with a finely pierced and engraved balance cock and tulip-form movement pillars. 

To control the striking, there is a small silver count wheel, which measures out the blows struck by a hammer on the bell housed inside the back of the inner case.


The finely fashioned gold dial matches the gold pair-cases made for Quare by William Jaques, whose mark, 'WI', appears in both cases. Jaques was one of the leading casemakers in London at the end of the seventeenth century, and ran one of the more prolific workshops of the time, making cases not only for Quare but also for many other makers, including Joseph Windmills, Simon Decharmes and John Bushman. Born around 1665, in 1679 Jaques was apprenticed in the Clockmakers' Company, first to John Wright and then to Nathaniel Delander. In 1687 Jaques became a Freeman in the Clockmakers' Company and went on to serve as Master of the Company in 1716. His address was Angel Court, Snow Hill. When he died in 1719, the business was carried on by his widow, Sarah, who went into partnership with the casemaker John Lee, one of Jaques's former apprentices.


The cases of this watch show the high-quality workmanship of William Jaques and his workshop. To allow the sound of the bell to escape, the outer case bezel is pierced with a series of graded roundels which alternate with baskets of flowers. The decoration of the case band echoes this design, and carries four portrait busts, two of them possibly of King William III and Queen Mary. 

The inner case is finely pierced with foliate scrolls, strapwork and birds and, in the middle of the back, a shield of arms: 'vairĂ© argent and sable, a fesse gules, crest: a stump of a tree proper raguly argent. 'These are the arms of the Bracebridge family, of Atherstone Hall in Warwickshire, but also with branches in Lincolnshire and Suffolk. However, the style of the shield suggests that the arms 'were probably engraved at a later date and are not those of the first owner. 

Another clue to the history of the watch is a scratched inscription under the bell, which reads 'T. Dutton, Walsall Dec. 1830'. This suggests that the watch was repaired by Thomas Dutton, a clock- and watchmaker who was married in Walsall, Staffordshire, in 1815 and worked there until 1865.


... and if you became concerned about some seasonally divergent anomalies between the old expensive sundial and your expensive new clock-watch ...


... then this might help to calm your anxiety and agitation ...


















The trade card of Richard Street, clockmaker, at ye Dial and Two Crowns, over against St. Dunstan's Church in Fleet Street, London; clock face with two crowns above, with large equation of time table below.


Thursday, March 7, 2024

concordia parux res crescunt ... THE MERCHANT TAYLORS' motto revised ... PARODY AND / OR PASTICHE ? ... i never clearly understood the distinction between pastiche and parody ... maybe this little work of art condenses both senses into one creation ... first, the variant ... then, the original ...


 









THE MERCHANT TAYLORS GUILD is very nearly seven hundred years old and is rightly proud of its status and its achievements.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worshipful_Company_of_Merchant_Taylors















Official Blazon


Arms : Argent, a pavilion imperial purple [i.e. crimson] garnished Or [lined ermine] between two mantles also imperial purple [lined ermine]; on a chief azure a lion passant [guardant] gold.


Crest: On a wreath argent and azure, On a mount vert a lamb argent in sunbeams Or. Mantled gules, doubled argent.


Supporters: On either side a camel Or.


Motto: Concordia parvae res crescunt


Origin/meaning


The arms were officially granted on 23 December 1586 to replace an earlier grant of 23 October 1481.


The new grant substituted a lion of England for the holy lamb on the chief, and to replace the crest of Virgin and Child with a secular version of the holy lamb: "a lambe silver in the sonne beames golde"; the camel supporters were also added at this time.


While it is possible that suppression of the religious symbols was a late effect of the Reformation, it is at least equally likely that the change was due to a desire to conform to a more austere taste in heraldry. A number of guilds had expediently secularized their arms during the period of the Reformation, and as late as 1582 the Parish Clerks had sought a new grant because their arms were " over muche charged with certayne superstition ".


The arms show an pavilion and two mantles, both indicating the trade of a tailor. Initially the guild consisted of tailors and armourers, the latter making the inner, textile, layers of armory. But already by the time of the 2nd charter, many members were more merchants as tailors. The name, however, was not changed. The pavi­lion which survives in the current arms was no doubt inspired by the similar canopy in which the Virgin sits in the 1481 crest; such canopies of dignity are familiar accompaniments to religious personages in art, and are similarly used in the arms of the Upholders.


Both the ancient crest of Virgin and Child, and the holy lamb allude to the Company's origin as a fraternity of St. John the Baptist, deriving as religious emblems from the Gospel of St. John


The lion of England on the chief refers to the royal charter granted by Henry VII, and the royal patronage is alluded to by this royal charge.


The camels first appear as supporters in 1586, but it is clear that the animal was already an established symbol of the Company. A camel was in fact an habitual feature of Merchant Taylors' pageants in the sixteenth century, and it may be that the beast was intended as a reference to the eastern trade of the Merchant Company, as was the camel crest of the Grocers, but no evidence has been found to confirm this.


It has also been speculated that the camels are a further reference to St. John Baptist, who, according to tradition, often is shown as wearing a camel fur cloak.


The exact origin thus is not clear.


The motto is a quotation from Gaius Sallustius Crispus: 


"Concordia parvae res crescunt, discordia maxumae dilabuntur", with harmony small things grow, while with discord the mightiest are ruined.



SO FAR SO GOOD ...



I knew nothing of the Merchant Taylors until yesterday when i came across an unusual piece of artwork in a surprising place.


I was looking for images of unicorns and phoenixes in heraldic contexts and was  scanning through some rare books that are freely available on-line through archive.org


https://archive.org/details/gri_33125008889384/page/n261/mode/2up


After looking at hundreds of images my weary eye was caught by a design that lacked conventional balance or symmetry.



Yer tiz ...













CONCORDIA PARUX RES CRESCUNT


I don't read Latin but quickly found a translation using the Google App.














Waggish ! ... innit ?  and seems appropriate in the context of the iconoclastic imagery.


So, wondering where it came from, I subsequently arrived at the original Merchant Taylors' motto ... sideways, so-to-speak ... and learned that it had itself been derived from the Roman historian, Sallust.


Full explanation here ...


https://www.merchant-taylors.co.uk/news/the-company-motto














Well, as you can guess, I was highly amused, and remain deeply impressed by the artist's wit and subtlety.


And my pleasure was amplified by the improbability of having found it in an antique German book held in a Californian library.












































So the big question was ... how do we discover the name of the artist ?


The artist's initials appear to be H. K.


British ?  or German ?  After all, Latin was a widely used language.


Elsewhere I found the same artist had signed himself  H KAUFMANN MUNCHEN, so the litho was made in Germany, for publication in Vienna.


And is this 1882 German lithograph derived from an English source ?


Perhaps from a tapestry or a carpet design ?

















fortunately ... the beginning of  Volume 2 had some scrupulously catalogued detail about the lithographers' who contributed ... although the old-fashioned Gothic typography strained my mind as well as my eyes ...


Amusingly and understandably, the book's editor seems to have decided that the Merchant Taylors' arms were those of a tent-maker ( Zeltmacher ) ...


But we have a name for the lithographer ... it looks like  ... D? KAUFMANN


... although so far I have found no corroborative evidence for this ID ...











so, not only, but also ...

the book's German-speaking editor had ( possibly, maybe ) quite understandably mistaken the Merchant Taylors' emblem for that of a TENTMAKER ... zeltmacher !


But is it a mistake ?


Later on, I remembered that tents were a big purchase item for market traders, armies and generals, even diplomats and kings .... think: field of the cloth of gold, etc









SO I AM CURRENTLY STUMPED BY THREE QUESTIONS ...


The proper name and any biographical detail of the 19thC lithographer.


The original source of his image, if copied.


The age or origin of the scholarly "joke", itself.


HELP !  ... CAN ANYONE HELP ?



Addendum ...


















also ...  next day ...


The University at Heidelberg have a slightly crisper scan ...



























... still have no information on D Kaufmann ( one eff ! )


Germany has a state museum of graphic design in munich with a big website but it is hard to navigate if you don't understand how to label the fields in their database


https://emp.graphische-sammlung.mwn.de/eMuseumPlus



Monday, March 4, 2024

Robert Recorde, The Tree of Knowledge, The Sphere of Destiny, and the Wheel of Fortune

Robert Recorde was a mathematician living in the early 1500s ... born in Tenby ... who introduced some of the common symbols that we use in our arithmetic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Recorde

He had a strong mind, training as a physician but choosing to lecture in mathematics at Oxford University

THE CASTLE OF KNOWLEDGE is a poster or broadsheet printed in his lifetime setting out the rationalist viewpoint of the conflict between reason and superstitious fatalism.










 






https://wellcomecollection.org/works/x8xqpuuc/images?id=z34wr83f


His views must have been respected because they were memorialized in plasterwork at Little Moreton hall in Cheshire.  The figure is clearly copied from the print.















The transcription error ... SPEARE instead of SPHERE ... must have confused many people with weaker minds than Robert Recorde's.



Monday, February 26, 2024

a peter birkhauser scrapbook ...


two videos provide a convincing perspective on his states of mind ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=qjZ7tlh_nzo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjwCxpylfNc



difficult to feel comfortable in peter's company ...

a troubled man haunted by fears and visions and wounded by depression ...

this painting led me to him 















for many years he was a highly succesful commercial artist ...

















































but he came to an unexpected crisis point and needed to change his practice radically ... a shift from great clarity towards multi-layered ambiguity ... possibly / maybe ?



speculation on the motives of such artists isn't always helpful
































































after many years, he seems to have gone back to a kind of painted-surface perfectionism ... perhaps an idealized notion of a cosmic perfection ?