Monday, May 14, 2012

shadow self-portait ... anyone might think it was the mayor of london creeping ...




















"The Trap" 

The first night that the monster lurched
Out of the forest on all fours
He saw its shadow in his dream
Circle the house, as though it searched
For one it loved or hated. Claws
On gravel and a rabbit's scream
ripped the fabric of his dream. 

Waking between dark and dawn 
And sodden sheets. His reason quelled
The shadow and the nightmare sound.
The second night it crossed the lawn
A brute voice in the darkness yelled.
He struggled up, woke raving, found
His wallflowers trampled to the ground. 

When rook wings beckoned the shadows back
He took his rifle down, and stood
All night against the leaded glass.
The moon ticked round. He saw the black
Elm-skeletons in the doomsday wood.
The sailing and the failing stars
And red coals dropping between bars. 

The third night such a putrid breath
Fouled, flared his nostrils, that he turned,
Turned, but could not lift, his head.
A coverlet as thick as death
Oppressed him: he crawled out: discerned
Across the door his watchdog, dead.
"Build a trap," the neighbours said. 

All that day he built his trap
With metal jaws and a spring as thick
As the neck of a man. One touch
Triggered the hanging teeth: jump, snap,
And lightning guillotined the stick
Thrust in its throat. With gun and torch
He set his engine in the porch. 

The fourth night in their beds appalled
His neighbors heard the hunting roar
Mount, mount to an exultant shriek.
At daybreak timidly they called
His name, climbed through the splintered door
And found him sprawling in the wreck,
Naked...with a severed neck. 

~ Jon Stallworthy

Thursday, May 10, 2012

tom denny

i think i might spend a little of next week's holiday tracking down some of tom denny's windows



http://www.moreintelligentlife.co.uk/content/arts/ann-wroe/alive-and-glowing?page=0%2C0

Monday, May 7, 2012

dear diary ...























i haven't bothered to get my hair cut for ages so i'm beginning to look like a mad professor

and i desperately need an emergency make-over

maybe i could apply for an improvement grant from the national lottery foundation

heaven knows they owe me !

i might check out the scurrilous rumours about the down-market clientele when i'm on my way from london to carmarthen next week ...


Thursday, May 3, 2012

apropos de nuffinque ... here is remedios varo's last painting


























i speculate ( because i don't know ) whether this painting conceals multiple layers of ambiguity ... but the question of concealment doesn't matter to much because, even when not intended, the ambiguities are still suggested

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

a quote from a confidential consultation ...

















before being prescribed a daily dose of aspirin and statins for obvious reasons ...

"i eat all the right kinds of food ... its just that i supplement them with all the wrong kinds !"

Sunday, April 29, 2012

in battersea, where prurience and modesty are almost siamese twins, you can't have too many net curtains ...







she isn't eccentric, she's just a mountain person ...


















...who calls herself my friend,

and begins a letter but can't be hurried to finish it,

or even post it ...

and then she starts another !

and eventually, after months of vexatious anticipation ...

the two arrive in the same post.

Saturday, April 28, 2012

in the online version of the spanish newspaper El Pais, we see that spanish doctors who treat illegal immigrants are facing awful ethical dilemmas














"First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me."



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came%E2%80%A6



i'm sorry what follows is so badly translated but I'm sure you'll get the general outline of the picture ....


http://sociedad.elpais.com/sociedad/2012/04/26/actualidad/1335468837_751700.html




SANITARY ADJUSTMENT
"I treat people who are uninsured"
The clinics appeal to their code of ethics to defend illegal immigrant care

The industry complains that it can not be vigilant system



IIl treat people who are uninsured." Josep Basra, president of the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (Semfyc), it is clear.  Always from a personal point of view, the decree that prevents serve illegal immigrants is not in our ethics.  "If I have a person before me, I do not care whether foreign or not, I have to meet them." he says.  A vision shared by the president of theMedical Association (WTO), Juan Jose Rodriguez Sendin:  "Just as I can not be compelled to perform euthanasia, so they can not force us to not to treat a patient."

The approach of Rodriguez Sendin and Basra is the same for most concerned health professionals that appeal to their code of ethics to defend treatment of illegal immigrants from Sept. 1 who are not entitled to a health insurance card, as the Royal Decree of settings published this week by the Government. 


"A patient is a patient black, white or mediopensionista, and we can not abandon them deontologically. It's crazy. We are not policemen or inspectors, if they ask me to support them as a doctor then I have to, another thing is you can not use the best technologies that I prefer - and then we'll see the administrative side, "says the president of the Spanish doctors. And this idea that they are going to have to act as policemen of the system to avoid suspected fraud or simply enforcing a rule bother them greatly. Some say they do not agree. Go for it, say, the insubordinates through some kind of conscientious objection, but in reverse.
The Coordinadora Anti-Privatisation of Public Health in Madrid has been the one that has lit the fuse. "We call on the ethics of any and all public health professionals for full attention to this population [over 150,000], belonging largely to disadvantaged groups. At the same time, we claim the right to conscientious objection on the part of all professionals to the effective implementation of Royal Decree, an immoral law, unjust, and dangerous in terms of public health, "say.
Semfyc, society presiding Basra, more than 20,000 professionals,"expresses its opposition to the ministerial decision to limit access to health care to immigrants "without papers". Also, like "warn of health risks" of leaving "without access to a continuum of care, and to restrict their attention through emergencies can generate higher spending and hamper disease control."
MORE INFORMATION
·        "People will die for this"
Maximo Gonzalez Jurado, President of the General Nursing Council, believes that professional ethical principles collide with the action taken by the ministry of Ana Mato. "The legal parentage of the patient is not our problem when it is a person who has a health problem. It is clear that we can not deny these children. Especially if we have no guarantee that those people who have been our patients can receive the care they need by other means", he says. "We do not begin to analyze the problem of illegal immigration, and who also is a medical tourist," he says. "But if these people are in Spain and need health care, as professionals we must give it. It is another thing is to have filters before reaching us," he says.
Jury Gonzalez does not dispute that the health system need measures to ensure sustainability, but criticizes the Government's health reform has been produced without the opinion of the professionals who have to implement it.  Although he believes that on that point they will not. "No doctor or nurse will stop giving a person the assistance they need. We have no obligation to ask the person the insurance card, "he says.
"Patients are not just a history. There is a person.  As professionals, they know we've had a relationship with them, "criticizes Pilar Navarro, secretary of the Health Sector Public Services Federation of UGT, which also argues that "professionally" they can not leave their patients unattended."This situation must be resolved because it is unfair humanely, if people can not reach us first, denying them assistance".
A similar idea is repeated from the College of Physicians of Madrid."From the ethical point of view no physician can fail to respond to any patient in need," said a spokesman.
A  health  coordinator  called  for  disobedience  to  the  dictate


Altisent Roger, a professor of bioethics at the medical school of Zaragoza, explains that from the standpoint ofMedical Ethics Code the situation is not simple. "It's not black and white.We are facing a variety of situations and very hard. We have served all who pass through the door without putting ourselves in the position of demanding proof of status", he says. The expert explained that the Code of Ethics, Article 6, states that "the doctor will never abandon a patient in need of care", and also speaks of the doctor to stop treating a patient, ensure the continuity in attendance. "These are points that are not designed for this, but that could be applied," he says. Doctors who do take the path of disobedience: ask to be excused from a legal obligation and not be punished.
To Altisent, that last track is an interesting path to explore. "This should be done to alleviate dramatic situations," he says. And at this point criticizes the government places health professionals in a very uncomfortable situation. "Perhaps the national health system itself will have to arbitrate for intermediate situations, not their doctors who are in a very delicate situation deontologically" he says. So much so that the Medical College will address the issue in assembly. "They are not scenarios for us, and they must be analyzed," says its president Juan Jose Rodriguez Sendin.
The nurse Angel Navarro, a spokesman for the coordinator to promote insubordination, says that his is a "call to the whole system." "We have only launched the idea. We cannot  develop a legal system", he says. For Navarro, which proposes to deny care to patients they have known and yreated for years is "inhumane, unjust, it is against our conscience and our code of ethics."
The  problem  is  to  ensure  continuity  of  treatment


Miguel, a family doctor in Madrid who gives a false name, is sympathetic to the idea of ​​the objection. "In 25 years I have seen enough immigrant population, and I have had very painful cases. People who have fled armed conflict, their family have been killed." "Many, after all, are  in highly sensitive situations of mental health. How will I treat someone with schizophrenia, depression? If it is difficult for anyone who takes pills for them in this situation will be even more, "he says. So Michael's proposal seems "reasonable." "It's in our code of ethics." "What we are being asked to do is repugnant to morality." "I work for the patient, and I will maximize flexibility in the criteria of what is an emergency. Or are we going to become police for the immigration control system? ".
The doctor suggests difficulty at a practical level. "One thing is early diagnosis and other treatment," he says, with the idea that once served, there are issues, like getting the drug, yes they can get very difficult. But he believes that, ultimately, the Government's proposal will be like "holding back the tide." "The system already has holes. At primary level there are emergencies, and they either put a policeman at the door, or admit anyone who comes saying he has something urgent to be addressed. "The bad thing for him is that in the end, care will be worse. "It will be desperate to know that a person needs treatment and it cannot be provided."